Queensland Housing Commission Residence (former)

The houses were constructed on land that was originally subdivided into blocks of just under two roods (2,000m2) and marketed as The Hurdcotte Estate in the mid 1880s. Four allotments were purchased by Louisa Price in November 1885, and the rest of this part of the estate weas purchased in April and May 1886. Between 1908 and 1913 the allotments were brought by Fredrick and Mary Rose who, apart from selling two subdivisions in 1917, sold the entire estate to the Co-ordinator – General Public Works in June 1945. The other two subdivisions were acquired by the Co-ordinator – General at the same time. Following the passing of the State Housing Act of 1945, the land was vested in the Queensland Housing Commission in April 1946 and portions of the subdivisions dedicated for road in May 1946.

Housing shortages which were evident during the depression became critical during the war years. Traditional Queensland State Housing authorities secured abandoned building sites on individual basis for the construction of state assisted dwellings. The government intended to follow this piecemeal approach when housing became a top priority for the state and the Commonwealth governments towards the end of the war. It was argued that pre-existing blocks offered ready access to water, power and transport. A Commonwealth government investigation however, showed that this approach delayed construction work, and recommended large scale estates. Consequently the Queensland Co-ordinator – General acquired four tracts of land on Brisbane’s northside. The smallest of these was the 32 blocks bounded by Hurdcotte and Pickering Streets at Enoggera. Acting Premier Hanlon, announcing the purchase, indicated that the government had chosen a site which fulfilled every criteria-Enoggera has “good access, and (was) handy to school and shopping facilities”. This estate is thus one of the first planned housing estates developed by the Queensland by the Queensland Housing Commission. 

The design of the estate and its housing was influenced by a number of factors – the availability of material and skilled labour, Commonwealth concerns with economy and uniformity, and post-war reconstruction philosophies emphasising community development. 

Post-war shortages in the supply of timber and roffing iron encouraged the use of the alternative building materials. Bricks, fibro cement, terra-cotta and concrete were used. As this was one of the first estates, brick was used before less traditional materials. It was not long however before bricks became scarce as increased demand outstripped even the increased output made possible by mechanisation and industry expansion.

Shortages of skilled labour also hindered large scale construction of housing. Despite 11,000 building tradesmen being released from the Civil Constructions Corps between 1944 and 1945, only 3,000 were involved in domestic construction. To boost the numbers of tradesmen, the Commonwealth established a Reconstruction Training Scheme which provided accelerated training and subsided wages for return serviceman. The Queensland Housing Commission provided the land, plans, materials and specialist services for trainees. Once the trainees had developed a proficiency level of 40% under the Department of Public Instruction, on-site training was provided by the Queensland Housing Commission. Mainly carpenters, but also plumber, painters, plasterers and bricklayers were trained in this manner. While most trades were easy to provide training for, bricklayers were more difficult to accommodate as this method of residential construction was then uncommon in Queensland. The QHC established a special trainee pool of bricklayers to supply government and industry. The first of these men were trained constructing the houses on this estate at Enoggera. In November 1946 it was reported that this special pool of trainee bricklayers had built 33 houses for the QHC. This estate is significant for its association with the Commonwealth Reconstruction Training Scheme and the specialised training of bricklayers.

For this type of scheme to be successful, the QHC relied on competent tradesmen tendering for the construction of their houses. The QHC cultivated relationships with some builders in anticipation of a continuing relationship. The builder of this estate, T.J Larking, is one such case. After the completion of these houses, a late tender by him was considered separately because his work was ‘well known’ to the Commission. 

While acceding to Commonwealth Government recommendations in many regards, the Queensland Housing Commission also developed a measure of independence in the matter of the styles of housing it provided. The Housing Minister (Mr Bruce) was reluctant to follow the New South Wales example of erecting blocks of flats, commenting early in 1946 that Queenslanders preferred individual housed on blocks of land where they could engage in gardening. Thus, while adopting the common standards laid down by the Commonwealth in relation to maximum floor standards, Queensland authorities resisted the pressure for uniformity and ‘uttermost economy’. There was a groundswell of popular concerns with the same ‘sameness’ of mass produced housing, and the Lord Mayor of Brisbane, Chandler, stressed the need to avoid standardisation and called for variety in the design of housing. This estate displays the material attempt to address these concerns – it contains a variety of design to avoid the appearance of ‘sameness’ and individual houses have space for gardens.

As well as addressing popular concerns with uniformity, the type of planning displayed in this estate draws on the ‘the garden city movement’ then predominant in planning and architectural circles. It displays what has been described as the ‘quintessential garden city environment’ – ‘a pleasant residential scene with the accent on space, greenness and community’. Although the QHC only once introduced the total planned community championed by garden city purists, it did attempt to provide space for parks and playgrounds. While these often were left as vacant neglected spaced due to disputes between local councils and the QHC as to who was responsible for developing and maintaining them, the early estates at Stafford and Enoggera are the only housing Commission developments to have houses situated around a central reserve.

1. Brisbane City Council Water Supply & Sewerage Detail Plans

2. Brisbane City Council Four chain cadaster maps

3. Brisbane City Council, 1946 aerial photographs.

4. Department of Natural Resources, Queensland Certificates of title and other records.

5. Hollander, Robyn, Housing Under Labour: The Queensland Housing Commission, 1945-57, Phd Thesis, Griffith University, 1996.